From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 8 08:25:33 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B09C16A4CE; Sat, 8 Nov 2003 08:25:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailbox.rainbownet.com (mailbox.rainbownet.com [213.174.191.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF05D43FB1; Sat, 8 Nov 2003 08:25:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from aturetta@commit.it) Received: from nbangx ([151.30.163.93]) (authenticated user aturetta@rainbownet.com) by rainbownet.com (rainbownet.com [127.0.0.1]) (MDaemon.PRO.v6.8.5.R) with ESMTP id 17-md50000000309.tmp; Sat, 08 Nov 2003 17:25:29 +0100 Message-ID: <001d01c3a614$ed0fd3a0$5e2aa8c0@lan> From: "Angelo Turetta" To: "Autrijus Tang" , "Matthew Seaman" References: <200311071210.hA7CACtS062161@sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu> <1068261132.1982.14.camel@localhost> <002001c3a5d8$8b692a70$5e2aa8c0@lan> <20031108093748.GB69895@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <1068292283.1982.30.camel@localhost> Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2003 17:25:27 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Authenticated-Sender: aturetta@rainbownet.com X-Spam-Processed: rainbownet.com, Sat, 08 Nov 2003 17:25:29 +0100 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-MDRemoteIP: 151.30.163.93 X-Return-Path: aturetta@commit.it cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: demon@freebsd.org cc: Quincey Koziol Subject: Re: FreeBSD rt3 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2003 16:25:33 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Autrijus Tang" Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2003 12:51 PM >> Actually, the p5-DBD-mysql port already depends on mysql-client. > >Whilst I agree on principle, I'm also aware that the RT team has >deprecated Mysql 3.x for a while now, and Mysql 4.1 is not yet stable >(by first-hand experience) -- so 4.0 seems to be the only reasonable >version to use with RT. Even so, WHY should I install mysql-server when this port only really needs the db CLIENT libraries ??? We manage dozens WEB machines, but we don't need the database server in every one. Thanks, Angelo Turetta