Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 09:09:37 +0000 From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/metapixel Makefile distinfo Message-ID: <20110207090937.GA31626@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <4D4FB5C5.2070404@FreeBSD.org> References: <201101152257.p0FMvSTR058827@repoman.freebsd.org> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1101152358150.2354@gerinyyl.fvgr> <20110128212637.GB4687@lonesome.com> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1102022359120.14698@gerinyyl.fvgr> <1297028744.16814.33.camel@hood.oook.cz> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1102062342430.8943@gerinyyl> <4D4FB5C5.2070404@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 10:05:09AM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > Of course it is always good to work with maintainers. It's more > considerate to alert maintainer of the change than just go and change > the port behind his back. And, for the maintainers that don't respond (at least to PRs), we _do_ track that. Maintainers do get reset all the time; it's just not very visible. It's also fair to let portmgr know if a maintainer is ignoring multiple emails. (We see this also with our "this port fails to build on pointyhat" emails.) mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110207090937.GA31626>