From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 17 07:29:50 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E545116A417 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2007 07:29:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alan@fromorbit.com) Received: from thing1.auspcmarket.com.au (thing1.auspcmarket.com.au [218.185.51.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB42D13C457 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2007 07:29:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alan@fromorbit.com) Received: by thing1.auspcmarket.com.au (Postfix, from userid 58) id 590E0190F; Fri, 17 Aug 2007 17:11:51 +1000 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.1 (2007-05-02) on thing1.auspcmarket.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, PLING_QUERY autolearn=no version=3.2.1 Received: from [192.168.1.99] (unknown [192.168.1.99]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: alan@auspc.com.au) by thing1.auspcmarket.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id D45CE43ACA for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2007 17:11:45 +1000 (EST) From: Alan Garfield To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 17:11:45 +1000 Message-Id: <1187334705.5342.7.camel@hiro.auspc.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.3 (2.8.3-2.fc6) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Stunnel starting up twice?!? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 07:29:51 -0000 Hey all, I've got a weird problem that's just appeared. I'd updated my ports to the latest CURRENT using portmanager, and now it seems like /usr/local/etc/rc.d/stunnel.sh is getting run twice! I have nuked my /etc/rc.d and run mergemaster -i. I'm running 6.2-RELEASE-p7, and the port is the latest available (stunnel-4.20). Anyone else seem similar? There is also a small bug in this port in that it fails to find the chroot'd pid file by default. Many thanks, Alan.