From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Apr 4 09:07:42 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 713AE5D096E for ; Sun, 4 Apr 2021 09:07:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ralf-mardorf@riseup.net) Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FCnxT152pz4gQ9 for ; Sun, 4 Apr 2021 09:07:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ralf-mardorf@riseup.net) Received: from fews2.riseup.net (fews2-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.84]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FCnxQ5kNQzDxWh for ; Sun, 4 Apr 2021 02:07:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1617527258; bh=BDtoH5QXW46S2mti6UfgrFD25rUzxjxGzffBRUvewRI=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=cwqyUZZYRoIlgLfFw4wJkrBGbCEv1AujhtfxIf7yKIQ3oix7VpU5Np4qD8ubgjErL ihO2zIemrGnkz5+FHVpsFI5/oeX7JAB6CJlsXuWMSmog6fHjT5dHxoFJoJFg5Tmwfk XpCElOTyhv1hlEdB3Td9KSoH5AbB57xU3ChdVJyI= X-Riseup-User-ID: 342507883B8927AB2FD3B73D422BC6CB4D4DD2CF39C2EB21C999D72F21844D26 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews2.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FCnxQ0B0Dz1yBW for ; Sun, 4 Apr 2021 02:07:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2021 11:07:31 +0200 From: Ralf Mardorf To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Access points and liability - Was : Wifi scanner for FreeBSD Message-ID: <20210404110731.191095cb@archlinux> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FCnxT152pz4gQ9 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=cwqyUZZY; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=riseup.net; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ralf-mardorf@riseup.net designates 198.252.153.129 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ralf-mardorf@riseup.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.60 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[198.252.153.129:from]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; HAS_ATTACHMENT(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[riseup.net:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[riseup.net,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[198.252.153.129:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16652, ipnet:198.252.153.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[198.252.153.129:from]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[riseup.net:s=squak]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/mixed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[198.252.153.129:from:127.0.2.255]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[riseup.net:dkim]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2021 09:07:42 -0000 Hi, I can't answer the question, but I've got a question myself, so I opened a new thread. On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 10:23:24 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote: >"tarara" is my AP in my house in about 900 meter distance. Isn't it risky to chose that much transmitting capacity? I'm not aware of any open access point with such a transmitting capacity. Don't you worry liability, if somebody does misuse your access point? Even if it's not an open access point, there's more than enough software available to access "non-open" access points. I set the transmitting capacity of my wifi to it's lowest level, see screenshot selection. Offered are 100%, 50%, 25%, 12% and 6%. I would be surprised to see it in about a 9 meter distance. Regards, Ralf -- >https://forums.ubports.com/assets/uploads/files/1615713748334-wifi-bank-900m.jpg The graphic does show male genitals.