Date: Fri, 10 May 96 12:33:50 -0500 From: "Jeff Wilson" <wilson@VNET.IBM.COM> To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: looping mail!! Message-ID: <9605101633.AA30119@belgium.fishkill.ibm.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Help! Am I the only person who has gotten about 1000 copies of this
message? Is someone working on this problem??
Jeff Wilson
------- Forwarded Message
Received: from fshvm1.fishkill.ibm.com by edamail.fishkill.ibm.com (AIX
3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
id AA29310; Fri, 10 May 1996 12:27:00 -0400
Received: from FSHVM1 by FSHVM1.FISHKILL.IBM.COM (IBM VM SMTP V2R3)
with BSMTP id 0689; Fri, 10 May 96 12:27:03 EDT
Received: by FSHVM1 (cvtto822 4.0.0) via <smtp2@iinus1> id 1637 (RFC822)
for <wilsonjd@fishkill>; Fri, 10 May 96 12:27:03 -0400
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org by vnet.IBM.COM (IBM VM SMTP V2R3) with
TCP;
Fri, 10 May 96 12:26:53 EDT
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost)
by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id HAA18668
Fri, 10 May 1996 07:00:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from root@localhost)
by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id GAA18164
for questions-outgoing; Fri, 10 May 1996 06:59:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dev01.interactive.com (pppA201.micronet.fr [193.149.100.55])
by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id GAA18114
for <questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 10 May 1996 06:59:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from root@localhost) by dev01.interactive.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id
PAA01587; Fri, 10 May 1996 15:59:09 GMT
Date: Fri, 10 May 1996 15:59:09 GMT
Message-Id: <XFMail.960510155908.fmtel@micronet.fr>
X-Mailer: XFMail 0.3-beta [p0] on FreeBSD
In-Reply-To: <199605101302.GAA04376@Root.COM>
Reply-To: fmtel@micronet.fr
From: <fmtel@micronet.fr>
To: <davidg@Root.COM>
Subject: Re: problems with SUP
Cc: <questions@freebsd.org>
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk
On Fri May 10 06:02:32 1996 David Greenman wrote:
>>>Hello,
>>for 2 or 3 days I have been trying to get the stable release thru sup,
>>and several times it remains stalled during at least 1 hour !
>>Do you see any explication ? Is it a bug in sup ?
>>Or is there a problem on the sup server ?
>
> Sprint has been having problems in the Bay Area recently, causing their
>route to wcarchive to go up and down. More specifically, Sprint keeps loosing
>their BGP peering session with the CIX router. I think the problem has been
>resolved.
>
>-DG
>
>David Greenman
>Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project
Best regards,
Jean-Marc BOTTURA - EXPERINFO
- ----------------------------------
E-Mail: fmtel@micronet.fr
Date: 05/10/96
Time: 15:55:48
- ----------------------------------
------- End of Forwarded Message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9605101633.AA30119>