Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 13:26:26 -0300 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br> To: Peter Seebach <seebs@plethora.net> Cc: <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Setting memory allocators for library functions. Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0102261326160.5502-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva> In-Reply-To: <200102242128.f1OLS2619633@guild.plethora.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 24 Feb 2001, Peter Seebach wrote: > In message <9820.983050024@critter>, Poul-Henning Kamp writes: > >I think there is a language thing you don't understand here. > > No, I just disagree. It is useful for the OS to provide a hook for > memory which is *known to work* - and that is the environment C specifies. Send patches. Rik -- Linux MM bugzilla: http://linux-mm.org/bugzilla.shtml Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose... http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.33.0102261326160.5502-100000>