From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 20:05:16 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6D22616 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:05:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from smtp.rcn.com (smtp.rcn.com [69.168.97.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A1EE338 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:05:16 +0000 (UTC) X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=YKIdOG6x c=1 sm=0 a=fEl05wXzeJCkBz9gs2itqQ==:17 a=XBbVgglCP-sA:10 a=ZrqZzSrQiogA:10 a=YNqtyO0l_hcA:10 a=LaogzpLLAAAA:8 a=CqN0Xa_Ne8wA:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=_4BPYxVLAAAA:8 a=4kWVwC1tfKeJio6dxwIA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=FdhU9TFdCwuk-XSU33gA:9 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=PeXs7KCET5mB0oEL:21 a=fEl05wXzeJCkBz9gs2itqQ==:117 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.mail=mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com; spf=neutral; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com header.from=mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.user=anat; auth=pass (PLAIN) Received-SPF: neutral (smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com: 209.6.63.29 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of aldan.algebra.com) Received: from [209.6.63.29] ([209.6.63.29:53217] helo=utka.zajac) by smtp.rcn.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.49 r(42060/42061)) with ESMTPA id 3E/2D-28101-AFAD3215; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:05:14 -0500 Message-ID: <5123DAF9.50400@aldan.algebra.com> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:05:13 -0500 From: "Mikhail T." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jung-uk Kim Subject: Re: Why can't gcc-4.2.1 build usable libreoffice? References: <511CED39.2010909@aldan.algebra.com> <51238AE9.20205@aldan.algebra.com> <5123ADEC.2040103@aldan.algebra.com> <5123CF37.7000506@FreeBSD.org> <5123D2F6.5040909@aldan.algebra.com> <5123D65D.2030301@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <5123D65D.2030301@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: Adrian Chadd , office@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org, Chris Rees X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:05:16 -0000 On 19.02.2013 14:45, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > Actually, I tried very hard to build sane LO with gcc 4.2 but it > wasn't fruitful. Eventually, I gave up on adding kludges after > kludges because LO is moving away from pre-C++11 compilers anyway.:-( Should not a pre-C++11 compiler simply /fail/ upon encountering C++11 code? > >And if there is a*good* reason to reject the base compiler, I'd > >expect such good reason to be documented -- preferably with > >bug-reports filed against either the FreeBSD and its toolchain or > >against the LibreOffice code. Or both... > I believe there were plenty PRs already. I can not find any :-( The ones against FreeBSD all talk about build failures (except the 176269 , filed today). There are no relevant bug-reports against LibreOffice, that mention "gcc-4.2.1" or "gcc 4.2.1 ". -mi