From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Jan 4 14:17:20 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id OAA01214 for questions-outgoing; Sun, 4 Jan 1998 14:17:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions) Received: from peedub.muc.de (newpc.muc.ditec.de [194.120.126.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA01206 for ; Sun, 4 Jan 1998 14:17:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from garyj@peedub.muc.de) Received: from peedub.muc.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by peedub.muc.de (8.8.8/8.6.9) with ESMTP id XAA01617 for ; Sun, 4 Jan 1998 23:17:23 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <199801042217.XAA01617@peedub.muc.de> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.1 12/23/97 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems with KDE port (Re: KDE under FreeBSD?) Reply-To: Gary Jennejohn In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 04 Jan 1998 23:43:09 +0200." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 04 Jan 1998 23:17:23 +0100 From: Gary Jennejohn Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Adrian Pavlykevych writes: >Hi everybody! > >It seems to me that there are some problems with KDE under FreeBSD >(I'm speeking about FreeBSD 2.2.5R and KDE Beta2) >Everything compiles cleanly after patches from port are applied, but (and >this is big but!) KFM is coredumping upon startup. And for me it seems >that KDE without KFM remains still nice window manager not more :-( > >I was asking some days ago if someone got it to run, and, if so, what >needs to be patched. Personaly, I had no time to dig deep enough to got >it running myself. > >I'm using Qt v1.31 and XFre v3.3.1 > well, kfm (made from the port) runs just fine for me under -current. Have you tried compiling it with -g and examining the core dump ? --- Gary Jennejohn Home - garyj@muc.de Work - garyj@fkr.dec.com