From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Nov 19 06:31:42 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37F9416A4CF
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 06:31:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.202.56])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3797F43FBF
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 06:31:41 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org)
Received: from be-well.no-ip.com ([66.30.200.37])
          by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with ESMTP
          id <2003111914314001200pb179e>; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 14:31:40 +0000
Received: by be-well.no-ip.com (Postfix, from userid 1147)
	id 669143A; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 09:31:40 -0500 (EST)
Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org
To: "Kevin McKay" <kevin@dhap.com>
References: <000801c3ae5b$44595cf0$0599a440@linuxops.com>
From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org>
Date: 19 Nov 2003 09:31:40 -0500
In-Reply-To: <000801c3ae5b$44595cf0$0599a440@linuxops.com>
Message-ID: <44fzgk4egj.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
Lines: 13
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
cc: questions@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Security question
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: questions@FreeBSD.org
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 14:31:42 -0000

"Kevin McKay" <kevin@dhap.com> writes:

> I have read through the documentation but have not been able to find
> a definite answer. I am running a pretty core install of 5.1 minimal
> + bind9, postfix, apache, ssh, no ports collection. Here is my
> question. When I run the binary update from sysinstall will that
> take care of the earlier ssh vulnerability and update apache postfix
> and bind to the most current version?

You normally need to run the sysinstall from the version you're
updating to.  You could configure your system's sysinstall to load in
the later version, and it should be compatible, but I don't know the
syntax for that offhand...