From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Jul 15 15: 3:57 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD4337B7AA; Sat, 15 Jul 2000 15:03:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id PAA02745; Sat, 15 Jul 2000 15:03:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2000 15:03:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway To: kmays Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenSSH v2.1.1p3 In-Reply-To: <001601bfee5f$65cb7680$b0d9d3c6@KenMays> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 15 Jul 2000, kmays wrote: > Can we put OpenSSH v2.1.1p3 in the STABLE branch of 4.x and 5.x or is it > being tested?!?!? I might have missed it under 4.0-07142000 stable and > 5.0-07142000 stable. I only see the older one there. Am I mistaken?!? -current and -stable both have 2.1.0 at this time - I intend to bring in 2.1.1, which is the latest release (2.1.1p3 is the "portable" version which contains all sorts of cross-platform crap we don't care about, and the patchlevel refers to portability fixes :-), but it won't be before 4.1-RELEASE. I don't know of any major bugfixes in 2.1.1 which would require it. Kris -- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message