From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 24 19:00:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B4C116A406 for ; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 19:00:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jaco@videoafrica.co.za) Received: from ctb-mesg5.saix.net (ctb-mesg5.saix.net [196.25.240.75]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEA7313C447 for ; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 19:00:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jaco@videoafrica.co.za) Received: from jacolaptop (dsl-243-182-217.telkomadsl.co.za [41.243.182.217]) by ctb-mesg5.saix.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2772425A3 for ; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:00:36 +0200 (SAST) From: "Jaco le Roux" To: References: <000001c87710$83243770$896ca650$@co.za> <20080224195523.V4625@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20080224195523.V4625@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:00:34 +0200 Message-ID: <000101c87717$9044a4b0$b0cdee10$@co.za> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Ach3FxYsuGtXK3TKRkyO87FSmlUm6QAACM3Q Content-Language: en-za Subject: RE: DHCP Server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 19:00:50 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Wojciech Puchar [mailto:wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl] > Sent: 24 February 2008 08:56 PM > To: Jaco le Roux > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: DHCP Server > > > BSD box, the other client is connected via a bridge on the first client. I > > have a section in my /usr/local/etc/dhcpd.conf to assign a specific IP to > > client #1: > > > > host myhost { > > hardware ethernet xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx; > > fixed address 192.168.1.16; > > } > > > > The problem is, both client #1 and #2 get assigned the same IP address which > > results in a conflict (I'm guessing because they appear to be behind the > > it means that the first client's "bridge" is not a bridge. Hm. Well it's a bridge made by windows xp from one interface to another. You're telling me that it won't work like that? If I use 'arp ip-address' on the two clients, it resolves to the same MAC address :/