From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 2 06:07:56 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA607106566B; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 06:07:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D63238FC13; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 06:07:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id JAA10522; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 09:07:53 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1Qo88v-000HLY-15; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 09:07:53 +0300 Message-ID: <4E379438.2040701@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 09:07:52 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110706 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jung-uk Kim References: <201107312128.29322.lobo@bsd.com.br> <201108011548.03059.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <4E370793.8080809@FreeBSD.org> <201108011708.58713.jkim@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201108011708.58713.jkim@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2pre Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Phenom II 975 BE shows 0 celsius X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 06:07:56 -0000 on 02/08/2011 00:08 Jung-uk Kim said the following: > On Monday 01 August 2011 04:07 pm, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> on 01/08/2011 22:48 Jung-uk Kim said the following: >>> amdtemp(4) attaches under PCI bus but its sibling on function 2 >>> isn't easy to address, i.e., hostbN. >> >> pci_find_bsf() should help with that. > > I thought about that but it seemed like an overkill because this > driver is strictly MD anyway. :-) It's just that pci_cfgregread() has very low level feel to it, nothing else... -- Andriy Gapon