From owner-freebsd-bugs  Thu Feb 29 16:10:05 1996
Return-Path: owner-bugs
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id QAA22603
          for bugs-outgoing; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 16:10:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id QAA22597
          Thu, 29 Feb 1996 16:10:02 -0800 (PST)
Resent-Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 16:10:02 -0800 (PST)
Resent-Message-Id: <199603010010.QAA22597@freefall.freebsd.org>
Resent-From: gnats (GNATS Management)
Resent-To: freebsd-bugs
Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats@freefall.FreeBSD.org,
        tege@noisy.matematik.su.se
Received: from noisy.matematik.su.se ([130.237.198.146])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA14876
          for <FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org>; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 14:30:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from tege@localhost) by noisy.matematik.su.se (8.6.12/8.6.12) id XAA05612; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 23:27:57 +0100
Message-Id: <199602292227.XAA05612@noisy.matematik.su.se>
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 23:27:57 +0100
From: tege@matematik.su.se
Reply-To: tege@noisy.matematik.su.se
To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.2
Subject: bin/1054: /bin/sh problem with new GCC (snapshot for 2.8)
Sender: owner-bugs@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk


>Number:         1054
>Category:       bin
>Synopsis:       /bin/sh problem with new GCC (snapshot for 2.8)
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    freebsd-bugs
>State:          open
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Thu Feb 29 16:10:01 PST 1996
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Torbjorn Granlund
>Organization:
TMG Datakonsult
>Release:        FreeBSD 2.1-STABLE i386
>Environment:
Hardly relevant.

>Description:

The /bin/sh of FreeBSD doesn't work as on other systems, or like bash.
The problem seems to be with the builtin `eval'.

>How-To-Repeat:

bash$ foo=tomte; var=foo; echo `eval echo \\$$var`
tomte
sh$ foo=tomte; var=foo; echo `eval echo \\$$var`
5578var

>Fix:
	
I don't know of any fix that is compatible with a non-flawed sh.  A fix
would be desirable if you want your users that install GCC 2.8 to avoid
problems.  Just imagine the flood of bug reports that you will get...

If you provide me with a (reasonable) fix, I will put it in to the gcc
repository in time for 2.8.
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: