From owner-freebsd-ports  Fri Jan  7 10:46:18 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7BA8F14ECD; Fri,  7 Jan 2000 10:46:16 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA12835;
	Fri, 7 Jan 2000 10:43:30 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
To: itojun@iijlab.net
Cc: Marcin Cieslak <saper@system.pl>, sumikawa@ebina.hitachi.co.jp,
	asami@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: IPv6-enable ports 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 08 Jan 2000 02:32:01 +0900."
             <9849.947266321@coconut.itojun.org> 
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2000 10:43:30 -0800
Message-ID: <12833.947270610@zippy.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

> 	I think that binary packages should be shipped with IPv4/v6 dual
> 	support compiled in.  Otherwise you end up shipping two binary
> 	packages - which isn't really fun.

I have to agree.  The alternatives seem very icky to the release engineer. :)

- Jordan


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message