Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 27 May 2015 14:34:05 -0500
From:      Matthew Donovan <kitche@kitchetech.com>
To:        Roger Marquis <marquis@roble.com>
Cc:        freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, Mark Felder <feld@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: New pkg audit / vuln.xml failures (php55, unzoo)
Message-ID:  <CABgom6eJzHSjgK32AcTEavL2uTG8c9Z6szD=xzggioBhs%2BzjGQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150527174038.9B78EB77@hub.freebsd.org>
References:  <alpine.BSF.2.11.1505171402430.52815@eboyr.pbz> <20150523153029.B7BD3280@hub.freebsd.org> <1432659389.3130746.278522905.6D1E6549@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20150527174038.9B78EB77@hub.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I found the ports security reporting without issues
http://www.freebsd.org/security/reporting.html. Appears someone  should
read reporting page Instead of saying information is not correct.
On May 27, 2015 12:40 PM, "Roger Marquis" <marquis@roble.com> wrote:

> If you find a vulnerability such as a new CVE or mailing list
>>> announcement please send it to the port maintainer and
>>> <ports-secteam@FreeBSD.org> as quickly as possible.  They are whoefully
>>> understaffed and need our help.
>>>
>> Mark Felder wrote:
>
>> Who is "ports-secteam"?
>>
>
> It was Xin Li who alerted me to the ports-secteam@freebsd.org address
> i.e., as being distinct from the "FreeBSD Security Team"
> (secteam@freebsd.org) address noted on
> <https://www.freebsd.org/security/>.
>
>  There has been no Call For Help that I've ever seen. If people are needed
>> to process these CVEs so they are entered into VUXML, sign me up to
>> ports-secteam please.
>>
>
> I believe that is part of the problem, or the multiple problems, that
> lead me to believe that FreeBSD is operating without the active
> involvement of a security officer.  Specifically:
>
>  * port vulnerability alerts sent to secteam@, as indicated on the
>  /security/ page, are neither forwarded to ports-secteam@ for review nor
>  returned to the sender with a note regarding the correct destination
>  address,
>
>  * the freebsd.org/security web page is not correct and not being
>  updated,
>
>  * aside from Xin nobody from either ports-secteam@ or secteam@ much
>  less security-officer@ seems to be reading or participating in the
>  security@ mailing list,
>
>  * nobody @freebsd.org appears to be following CVE announcements and the
>  maintainers of several high profile ports are also not following it or
>  even their application's -announce list,
>
>  * there appears to be no automated process to alert vuln.xml maintainers
>  (ports-secteam@) of potential new port vulnerabilities,
>
>  * offers of help to secteam@ and ports-secteam@ are neither replied to
>  nor acted upon (except for Xin Li's request, thanks Xin!),
>
>  * perhaps as a result the vuln.xml database is no longer reliable, and
>  by extension,
>
>  * operators of FreeBSD servers (unlike Debian, Ubuntu, RedHat, Suse and
>  OpenBSD server operators) have no assurance that their systems are secure.
>
> This is a MAJOR CHANGE from just a couple of years ago which calls for an
> equally major heads-up to be sent to those running FreeBSD servers and
> looking to the freebsd.org website for help securing their systems.
>
> The signifiance of these 7 bullets should not be overlooked or
> understated.  They call in to question the viability of FreeBSD itself.
>
> IMO,
> Roger Marquis
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CABgom6eJzHSjgK32AcTEavL2uTG8c9Z6szD=xzggioBhs%2BzjGQ>