From owner-freebsd-current Thu Oct 8 09:18:45 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA26306 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 8 Oct 1998 09:18:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.40.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA26284 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 1998 09:18:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.9.1/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA05745; Thu, 8 Oct 1998 18:12:19 +0200 (CEST) To: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling C. =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= ) cc: Matthew Thyer , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is tickadj still required in -CURRENT ? In-reply-to: Your message of "08 Oct 1998 17:48:00 +0200." Date: Thu, 08 Oct 1998 18:12:18 +0200 Message-ID: <5743.907863138@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message , Dag-Erling C. =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= writes: >Poul-Henning Kamp writes: >> In message <199810081342.XAA01038@eddie.dsto.defence.gov.au>, Matthew Thyer writes: >> > So, has FreeBSD-CURRENT's kernel been fixed and can tickadj be removed >> > from the base system ? >> Yes and no. > >Care to elaborate, or are we just too stupid to comprehend the depth >of Your Maginificence's explanation? Yes, it has been fixed. No, it hasn't been removed. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." "ttyv0" -- What UNIX calls a $20K state-of-the-art, 3D, hi-res color terminal To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message