Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 03:30:23 -0500 From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> To: Erwin Lansing <erwin@lansing.dk> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-wm Makefile Message-ID: <20040304083023.GF20689@toxic.magnesium.net> In-Reply-To: <20040304082727.GC23759@droso.net> References: <200403040801.i2481HWd038215@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040304081809.GC20689@toxic.magnesium.net> <20040304082237.GB23759@droso.net> <20040304082500.GE20689@toxic.magnesium.net> <20040304082727.GC23759@droso.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> (03.04.2004 @ 0327 PST): Erwin Lansing said, in 2.1K: << > On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 03:25:00AM -0500, Adam Weinberger wrote: > > > > > > > > Please back this out. ion-devel was a repocopy for Edwin, who never did > > > > anything with it. AFAIK ion-devel is still identical to ion. I'm working > > > > on an ion2 PR. > > > > > > > Actually, your commit to modules broke sanity checks. You should also > > > fix that: > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/CVSROOT-ports/modules.diff?r1=1.9566&r2=1.9567&f=h > > > > Hrmmn... I was hoping just to make ion-devel's path more accessible. I > > can back that out easily enough. > > On second thought, I'll add a comment to Makefile and comment out > ion-devel so it is clear why it isn't hooked up to the build. >> end of "Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-wm Makefile" from Erwin Lansing << Heh. I just backed ion-devel out of modules. I ain't adding it back in. You're welcome to though ::P In fact...... maybe we should just remove ion-devel altogether. ion2 will be the next version, and it's not a development branch. It's unnecessary to have this thing sitting in the tree gathering dust. # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adamw@vectors.cx // adamw@FreeBSD.org // adamw@magnesium.net http://www.vectors.cx
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040304083023.GF20689>