From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Oct 20 19:48:53 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id BA78F16A4CF; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:48:53 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5416143D41; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:48:53 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org)
Received: from [192.168.254.11] (junior-wifi.samsco.home [192.168.254.11])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by pooker.samsco.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9KJnI7V051194;
	Wed, 20 Oct 2004 13:49:19 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org)
Message-ID: <4176C0C8.4060408@freebsd.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 13:47:20 -0600
From: Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040929
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org>
References: <41767CF1.2020005@FreeBSD.org>
	<20041020.105839.100358845.imp@bsdimp.com>
	<20041020170907.GA1216@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv>
	<200410201913.42879.max@love2party.net> <20041020194547.GD2195@ip.net.ua>
In-Reply-To: <20041020194547.GD2195@ip.net.ua>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.1.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=3.8 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on pooker.samsco.org
cc: Max Laier <max@love2party.net>
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped
	/kernel ?]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture
	<freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:48:53 -0000

Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 07:13:35PM +0200, Max Laier wrote:
> 
>>Why is this discussion ongoing? The consensus seems pretty clear: "Implement 
>>it, but have a make.conf option to turn it off." If there is concern with 
>>this make if default to off and have an option to turn it on.
>>
> 
> Implementing this is very easy, since it's already implemented,
> just not by default.
> 
> What everyone seem to have forgotten is that we also have modules,
> and in the "config -g" case, we also build debug versions of the
> modules.  And if we're also going to install modules with debug
> symbols, I think this puts the requirement for the root file
> system way beyond the rational limits.
> 
> 
> Cheers,

I tend to agree.  What do you think of my proposal to have installkernel
(optionally or whatever) put unstriped binaries somewhere outside of the
root partition?

Scott