From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 4 09:48:35 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22664106566C for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 09:48:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matt@xtaz.co.uk) Received: from mail.xtaz.co.uk (tao.xtaz.co.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:294::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C88878FC12 for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 09:48:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: gmail) by mail.xtaz.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0394DB07530 for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 10:48:32 +0100 (BST) Received: by vws11 with SMTP id 11so266438vws.13 for ; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 02:48:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.23.18 with SMTP id i18mr957473vdf.27.1317721710799; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 02:48:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.159.103 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 02:48:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 10:48:30 +0100 Message-ID: From: Matt Smith To: "Li, Qing" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: gif interface not passing IPv6 packets X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 09:48:35 -0000 On 3 October 2011 22:33, Li, Qing wrote: > Please give the following patch a try and let me know how it > works out for you. > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0http://people.freebsd.org/~qingli/in6.c.diff I have just applied the patch, recompiled the kernel, and rebooted with my original configuration in rc.conf and all interfaces have come up as expected now. The routes are there, I can ping everything, and I can connect to everything as expected. I don't know if this is going to affect 9.0? But if it does could it get committed into that tree to make it into the release? Matt.