From owner-freebsd-questions Wed May 6 12:37:26 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA01442 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Wed, 6 May 1998 12:37:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gdi.uoregon.edu (gdi.uoregon.edu [128.223.170.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA01382 for ; Wed, 6 May 1998 12:37:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by gdi.uoregon.edu (8.8.7/8.8.8) with SMTP id MAA10851; Wed, 6 May 1998 12:37:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu) Date: Wed, 6 May 1998 12:37:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White Reply-To: Doug White To: Studded cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: malloc.h vs. stdlib.h In-Reply-To: <35501D69.687C70C5@san.rr.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 6 May 1998, Studded wrote: > When compiling someone else's stuff I often see warnings to the effect > of, "warning, this file includes malloc.h which is a bad thing, please > use stdlib.h instead." I am wondering if it's worthwhile to actually > make that change in the software and recompile. Probably. That way we're sure it's using our enhanced malloc instead of a local reimplementation. Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message