From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 28 19:34:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 856FD106564A for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 19:34:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43BFA8FC14 for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 19:34:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so3627427qwj.13 for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 11:34:35 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.81.206 with SMTP id y14mr3106192qck.127.1296243274737; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 11:34:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.102.19 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 11:34:34 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [93.221.175.76] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 20:34:34 +0100 Message-ID: From: "C. P. Ghost" To: David Brodbeck Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Emulators to test non-x86 FreeBSD ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 19:34:36 -0000 On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 7:56 PM, David Brodbeck wrote: > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 9:27 AM, C. P. Ghost wrote: >> Hello list, >> >> are there any emulators out there that can run the non-x86 versions of F= reeBSD >> on a FreeBSD/i386 or FreeBSD/amd64 host? >> >> I'm especially interested in trying FreeBSD/sparc64 port, but I'd also l= ike to >> test the FreeBSD/powerpc and the FreeBSD/arm ports on an emulator, befor= e >> seeking real hardware. > > QEMU claims PowerPC and ARM emulation support, but I don't know if > it's good enough to run FreeBSD. =A0PearPC is another PowerPC emulator, > but it was mainly targeted at running MacOS and the project appears to > have been stagnant since 2005. I'll check it out, thanks. > It depends a bit on what you're trying to determine. =A0If you're > looking to test stability or performance, the results you get from an > emulator are unlikely to have any real comparison to what you get on > real hardware. Basically, I'm interested in assembly language programming on those platforms. So if they ran in an emulator, that would be ideal, but I wouldn= 't mind a couple of real hardware boxes if there's no software alternative. BTW, have you guys any experience with emulators/gxemul? It doesn't cover sparc but claims to implement a complete arm and powerpc machine, at least for the corresponding netbsd ports. Thanks, -cpghost. --=20 Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/