From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 25 03:18:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E411D1065675 for ; Fri, 25 May 2012 03:18:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6300D8FC17 for ; Fri, 25 May 2012 03:18:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by werg1 with SMTP id g1so374145wer.13 for ; Thu, 24 May 2012 20:18:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=AqiHQDVa6RUvOofI/P+a0W0EIVKALOcefdndzYPQjAs=; b=jrSG2yMVGQRWGAmRqhAqlopd4+k7RJQDUBfULZBsB3FcMivQRfoFFxPlRy3XZVde3X biTVS2Cw4UO4VQWvXrqSG8TN4bFWCz3P6/JA2dVl2zr0udTBmfSDshnj+/uSM+oMf2A/ 0QtQXTIjvALhjWovevOilExQ+G7wP2JzZxHQQ= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=AqiHQDVa6RUvOofI/P+a0W0EIVKALOcefdndzYPQjAs=; b=kZzvmW8TmSRkI2atne2itQlWTbyEl8Q3uSEkv2lXJKoqXUn0SKHiFYjrHcNjSCjtT5 /S7dCaoacPK/P3frqKaYGWtWmQxGqQDyY+BV3qCFuafLnYSfbvEPKfoSfKxF4GFdsI4I rZ0BR8czosowvtEGFZqCC7r4JLtic4Iy0+B3y9oUP31YxiRXCAtTpj3LjNPuxaD/fqvG Z0985U4B0ZyQJZJRF1e7U9xAoO4XyEftn949gTvvzdHTqWgm9FBTziWEt2Q+Zy8oswKc XoY4QtTCodgKE5qTvZ4eD0hLDK+UMGJki/0A+6xt29T6C16ZgI4zJqzasvcRqhMSqech m+Ng== Received: by 10.180.105.69 with SMTP id gk5mr59521114wib.3.1337915898204; Thu, 24 May 2012 20:18:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: lists@eitanadler.com Received: by 10.223.85.202 with HTTP; Thu, 24 May 2012 20:17:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201205210632.q4L6WPI9081702@repoman.freebsd.org> <20120521143623.34087c13.miwi@FreeBSD.org> <4FB9E411.9030500@FreeBSD.org> <20120521070444.GG63744@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> From: Eitan Adler Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 20:17:47 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: hGsOqXApa7g6Dandvz4LJGmMlmg Message-ID: To: araujo@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn+pg+ZdtklxGS4FJrnRJjs1G3cUWoMMcv5qCkPAywdi+iTYhJkKPqD5DzN0KPJd47fJtsv Cc: Baptiste Daroussin , miwi@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, Dmitry Sivachenko , cvs-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/haproxy Makefile distinfo X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 03:18:20 -0000 On 24 May 2012 19:03, Marcelo Araujo wrote: > OK Eitan, > > I need to say sorry to everybody, because for security issues, I never have > asked anyone for approvals in case there is a maintainer time out. > My BAD! Note that security fixes may cause their own problems (the fix breaks everything else?). This is why explicit approval is needed. The maintainer should usually be contacted but in extreme cases portmgr or so may approve as well. (IMHO it should be expanded to secteam... but meh) -- Eitan Adler Source & Ports committer X11, Bugbusting teams