Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 23:02:12 +0200 From: Lasse Brandt <lasse@bitmand.com> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Default gateway on different net Message-ID: <D41212E8-3DA0-4C0D-B57F-0071755564DA@bitmand.com> In-Reply-To: <6BE964C4-0838-4DA6-9278-12C620CA1EE1@bitmand.com> References: <6BE964C4-0838-4DA6-9278-12C620CA1EE1@bitmand.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi again, Just wanted to update on the problem, in case someone stumbles upon this = in the archives - original mail: = http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2010-September/026481.html On 21. Sep 2010, at 12:37 , Lasse Brandt wrote: > 2) Should the default route really be the last route to be added in = /etc/network.subr:1057? (not sure if there is a reason to why its first = - but I feel guilty messing with that file directly :) ) I am still wondering about this. I found another post in the archives = going way back that asks the same question, but no really answer. In my = case it's important that the static routes are created before the = default route. Anyone know if there is a reason for the default to be first? > 3) Am I setting this up in a completely wrong way? > ( At this point it feels like "everything is right, but I miss _that_ = fundamental option/config somewhere ) Well, I was, after creating my static and default route, the only = missing part was: ndp -I re0 There is a more in-depth explanation on the matter here: http://social.bitmand.com/post/1168584251/hetzner-freebsd-and-ipv6 Best regards, Lasse Brandt
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?D41212E8-3DA0-4C0D-B57F-0071755564DA>