From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 11:47:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52F7E16A4CE; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 11:47:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from BASE.OTEL.net (BASE.OTEL.net [212.36.8.132]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1A4043D2F; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 11:47:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tbyte@OTEL.net) Received: from dragon.otel.net ([212.36.8.135]) by BASE.OTEL.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1Cc0IX-0008fR-6y; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 13:47:57 +0200 Message-ID: <41B6EA08.9020008@OTEL.net> Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 13:48:24 +0200 From: Iasen Kostov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041117 X-Accept-Language: bg, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Iasen Kostov References: <41B6E8B3.8090009@OTEL.net> In-Reply-To: <41B6E8B3.8090009@OTEL.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org cc: Robert Watson Subject: Re: em(4) VLAN + PROMISC still doesn't work with latest CVS version X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 11:47:58 -0000 Iasen Kostov wrote: > Robert Watson wrote: > >> On Wed, 8 Dec 2004, Iasen Kostov wrote: >> >> >> >>> The patch generates .rej against this version: >>> >>> /*$FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/em/if_em.c,v 1.44.2.4 2004/11/23 22:28:40 >>> rwatson Exp $*/ >>> >> >> >> >>> should I use the version from -CURRENT or it is possible (adjusted >>> patch) to work with this one ? >>> >> >> >> Odd. I successfully applied the patch against RELENG_5 here before >> sending it out, and against the same revision. Could you try deleting >> if_em, re-updating, and re-applying? The change to remove the busdma >> map >> deletion is needed because in the patched version, those failures occur >> before the mapping is allocated. There was a revision of if_em after >> initial attempts to fix the problem that didn't properly free the >> mappings, but I think it was the .3 revision in RELENG_5. One might >> expect the new patch to reject against that older revision because the >> deletions had not yet been inserted (so to speak). >> >> > #:> ls -l if_em.c > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 109829 Nov 24 00:28 if_em.c #:> ls -l if_em.c -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 109829 Dec 8 13:40 if_em.c That's weird - I've delete everything from the dir and cvsuped and the first one apears. Now it is the second one only dates differs. Is that a side effect of disk caches (dirhash possibly) ? :) > > root@DraGoN:/usr/src/sys/dev/em on ttypf > #:> patch < if_em.patch > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |Index: if_em.c > |=================================================================== > |RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/dev/em/if_em.c,v > |retrieving revision 1.54 > |diff -u -r1.54 if_em.c > |--- if_em.c 14 Nov 2004 20:20:28 -0000 1.54 > |+++ if_em.c 8 Dec 2004 10:30:03 -0000 > -------------------------- > Patching file if_em.c using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 1220 (offset 17 lines). > Hunk #2 failed at 1243. > Hunk #3 succeeded at 1266 with fuzz 2 (offset 17 lines). > 1 out of 3 hunks failed--saving rejects to if_em.c.rej > done > > #:> ident if_em.c > if_em.c: > $FreeBSD: src/sys/dev/em/if_em.c,v 1.44.2.4 2004/11/23 22:28:40 > rwatson Exp $ > > I've deleted the whole dir and cvsuped. Does 1.54 differs much from > 1.44.2.4 ? > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >