From owner-freebsd-arch  Tue Jul  4  1: 1: 9 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from axl.ops.uunet.co.za (axl.ops.uunet.co.za [196.31.2.163])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0583B37B65B
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Tue,  4 Jul 2000 01:01:06 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sheldonh@axl.ops.uunet.co.za)
Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.ops.uunet.co.za)
	by axl.ops.uunet.co.za with local-esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1)
	id 139NdS-00038e-00; Tue, 04 Jul 2000 10:00:50 +0200
From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>
To: papowell@astart.com
Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: was: Bringing LPRng into FreeBSD? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 03 Jul 2000 20:30:04 MST."
             <200007040330.UAA07644@h4.private> 
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2000 10:00:50 +0200
Message-ID: <12067.962697650@axl.ops.uunet.co.za>
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG



On Mon, 03 Jul 2000 20:30:04 MST, papowell@astart.com wrote:

> 1. Kerberos authentication,  as well as PGP, md5, etc. support.
> 
> 6. Printcap support that allows you to easily use LDAP,
>    NIS++,  SQL, or your favorite network database.

With the exception of Kerberos, md5 and NIS, these capabilities make
LPRng a prime candidate for being a port.

So can we drop this already? :-)

Ciao,
Sheldon.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message