From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 10 14:36:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AE27106566B for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:36:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amdmi3@amdmi3.ru) Received: from smtp.timeweb.ru (smtp.timeweb.ru [217.170.79.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDDB68FC15 for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:36:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amdmi3@amdmi3.ru) Received: from [213.148.20.85] (helo=hive.panopticon) by smtp.timeweb.ru with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LsHQ9-0008Nd-Ca for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:09:29 +0400 Received: from hades.panopticon (hades.panopticon [192.168.0.32]) by hive.panopticon (Postfix) with ESMTP id 588D6C172 for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:09:41 +0400 (MSD) Received: by hades.panopticon (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B0CB310883E; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:09:08 +0400 (MSD) Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:09:08 +0400 From: Dmitry Marakasov To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090410140908.GA81025@hades.panopticon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Subject: cpuset_t vs. cpu_set_t X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:36:35 -0000 I keep running into software that expects cpu_set_t type instead of cpuset_t (namely graphics/osg, devel/ace). Is it us using nonstandart name, or is it them? Also, can it be possible to typedef/define cpu_set_t as cpuset_t? -- Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D amdmi3@amdmi3.ru ..: jabber: amdmi3@jabber.ru http://www.amdmi3.ru