From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 2 19:27:04 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4554516A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 19:27:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ylpvm29.prodigy.net (ylpvm29-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.57.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE9E043D41 for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 19:27:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nate@root.org) Received: from [10.0.5.51] (adsl-64-171-184-204.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [64.171.184.204])j32JQVnr023004; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 14:26:32 -0500 Message-ID: <424EF205.6010202@root.org> Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 11:27:01 -0800 From: Nate Lawson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0RC1 (X11/20041205) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gleb Kurtsov References: <6.2.1.2.0.20050329143237.02f15990@64.7.153.2> <20050329154013.B52981@lexi.siliconlandmark.com> <20050330104117.A52981@lexi.siliconlandmark.com> <20050330123458.T52981@lexi.siliconlandmark.com> <424C41C3.50705@root.org> <20050402111839.GA847@h1.d> In-Reply-To: <20050402111839.GA847@h1.d> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Dan Cojocar Subject: Re: Interrupt storm X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 19:27:04 -0000 Gleb Kurtsov wrote: > On (31/03/2005 21:38), Dan Cojocar wrote: > >>On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:30:27 -0800, Nate Lawson wrote: >> >>>Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote: >>> >>>>On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dan Cojocar wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:53:48 -0500 (EST), Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dan Cojocar wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>I tried running GENERIC and i get the following lor and watchdog >>>>>>>timeout, no interrupt storms: >>>>>> >>>>>>--- 8< --- --- 8< --- >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Here is the full dmesg: http://cs.ubbcluj.ro/~dan/dmesg.txt.generic >>>>>>> I tried also my kernel with apic, i don't get interrupt storms but >>>>>>>i get watchdog timeout message just like with GENERIC. >>>>>>>Here is the full dmesg: http://cs.ubbcluj.ro/~dan/dmesg.txt.apic >>>>>>> And finally i tried my kernel without apic and without acpi, it's >>>>>>>running just fine, no interrupt storms, no watchdog timeout, but i >>>>>>>don't have acpi :(, here is the final >>>>>>>dmesg: http://cs.ubbcluj.ro/~dan/dmesg.txt.noacpi. > > if you want to get acpi you have to use old acpi pci link code. > cd sys/dev/acpica; cvs update -D 23-Nov-2004 -Pd acpi_pci[^.]* > it works fine for me with recent current. I'm a little confused. I don't know of anyone that has problems with the 6-current PCI irq code that works on 5-stable (which is what your cvs command updates it to). Do either of you have a problem with irq routing on 6-current that works on 5-stable? Please send details if so. -- Nate