Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2016 15:22:47 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 186045] patch to x11-drivers/xf86-input-mouse to support FlipXY Message-ID: <bug-186045-8047-kom3R3mL6a@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-186045-8047@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-186045-8047@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D186045 software@bertram-scharpf.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |software@bertram-scharpf.de --- Comment #3 from software@bertram-scharpf.de --- As the first line says it is "src/bsd_mouse.c". And it did not take me 2 (two!) years to find that out. Maybe the confusing point is that this is a patch of an already patched file. The first patch is "/usr/ports/x11-drivers/xf86-input-mouse/files/patch-src-bsd_mouse.c". (I give the whole path in case you do not manage to find it.) By the way, this first patch was changed two times in the last two years. Sure, the proposed patch could have been designed smarter. First of all the documentation is missing. It could have been submitted as a patch to the prior patch. But leaving a request that covers changes to 5 (five!) lines of code unanswered for almost two years, and then giving such an evasive answer, is a *real* bummer! --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-186045-8047-kom3R3mL6a>