From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Oct 2 00:54:28 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9199DE32826 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2017 00:54:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from mail.infocus-llc.com (mail.infocus-llc.com [199.15.120.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71C1174CA1 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2017 00:54:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from draco.over-yonder.net (c-75-65-60-66.hsd1.ms.comcast.net [75.65.60.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.tarragon.infocus-llc.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3y53TD1s6DzPg; Sun, 1 Oct 2017 19:49:20 -0500 (CDT) Received: by draco.over-yonder.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id 3y53TC3vMlzGsS; Sun, 1 Oct 2017 19:49:19 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2017 19:49:19 -0500 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" To: Marco Beishuizen Cc: Thomas Mueller , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status of portupgrade and portmaster? Message-ID: <20171002004919.GL53186@over-yonder.net> References: <81D84A650858BA40BF6936408052E6BC0138263988@msgdb11.utad.utoledo.edu> <201709290909.v8T99QtU006095@mxdrop301.xs4all.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Editor: vi X-OS: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2017 00:54:28 -0000 On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 09:21:31PM +0200 I heard the voice of Marco Beishuizen, and lo! it spake thus: > > Using portupgrade every day and still works great. Tried portmaster > once but liked portupgrade more. I use poudriere just for testing > ports. I also use portupgrade constantly on several systems, and portmaster occasionally for some special cases where it has advantages. I also use poudriere on a lot of systems. Actually, most, nowadays. And I'm extremely happy with it. But I expect the systems I'm running straight out of ports now will continue to do so for a very long time, since poudriere just won't fit at all. -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.