From owner-cvs-all Fri May 25 2:44:28 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from relay.nuxi.com (nuxi.cs.ucdavis.edu [169.237.7.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3993237B424; Fri, 25 May 2001 02:44:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@nuxi.ucdavis.edu) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (root@[206.40.252.115]) by relay.nuxi.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f4P9iNl26939; Fri, 25 May 2001 02:44:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.11.3/8.11.1) id f4P9iNe54945; Fri, 25 May 2001 02:44:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 02:44:23 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/include stddef.h Message-ID: <20010525024423.G54585@dragon.nuxi.com> Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200105241929.f4OJTG851150@freefall.freebsd.org> <20010525094810.D31416@sunbay.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010525094810.D31416@sunbay.com>; from ru@FreeBSD.ORG on Fri, May 25, 2001 at 09:48:10AM +0300 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 09:48:10AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > Modified files: > > include stddef.h > > Log: > > Back out rev 1.4 (wint_t and mbstate_t) as I am tired of the complaints. > > The STLport will probably become broken again, but I'll work on fixing it > > later. > > > > I wish someone would explain why the NetBSD Cirtus branch has the types > > in their stddef.h... > > > > Requested by: bde, ru > > PR: 27606 > > Submitted by: Naohiko Tsuji > > > > Revision Changes Path > > 1.5 +1 -11 src/include/stddef.h > > > Don't I said you that the port builds OK on -CURRENT without this?! Yes, but only if the patch is removed, but that is required on -stable. (and before you say, make the port apply the patch at times and not other times; the answer is "no") To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message