From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 26 21:45:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8362E16A41F for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 21:45:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kane.otenet.gr (kane.otenet.gr [195.170.0.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B896C43D48 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2005 21:45:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) by kane.otenet.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-1) with SMTP id j9QLjplE014937; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 00:45:51 +0300 Received: from flame.pc (flame [127.0.0.1]) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j9QLjivp008503; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 00:45:44 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by flame.pc (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j9QLjhUS008502; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 00:45:43 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 00:45:43 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Mark Linimon Message-ID: <20051026214542.GA8453@flame.pc> References: <200510262020.j9QKKv4Q073769@freefall.freebsd.org> <435FE939.6070203@unixforge.net> <20051026204634.GA42792@flame.pc> <435FEEBE.7060907@unixforge.net> <20051026212525.GA21809@soaustin.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051026212525.GA21809@soaustin.net> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org, "Eli K. Breen" Subject: Re: docs/87351: Jail building instructions don't work as described with default CSH shell X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 21:45:54 -0000 On 2005-10-26 16:25, Mark Linimon wrote: >On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 02:01:50PM -0700, Eli K. Breen wrote: >> I realize I may be opening a can of worms > > You are :-) Indeed. A very overful and nasty smelling can, too.