From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Aug 21 7:52: 4 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from alpha.root-servers.ch (beta.root-servers.ch [195.49.33.19]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ACA3837B42C for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 07:52:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 68581 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2000 14:51:59 -0000 Received: from client80-30.hispeed.ch (HELO 10.2.2.100) (62.2.80.30) by beta.root-servers.ch with SMTP; 21 Aug 2000 14:51:59 -0000 Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 16:53:53 +0200 From: Gabriel Ambuehl X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.45 Beta/6) Personal Organization: BUZ Internet Services X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <20887676.20000821165353@buz.ch> To: Chris Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re[2]: FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE is about as stable as windows98 In-reply-To: <20000820205723.A9781@kingsqueak.org> References: <23125715669.20000820212932@buz.ch> <20000820205723.A9781@kingsqueak.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I missed the start of this, but if this is VIA and UDMA66 with ICRC > errors and generally unstable fs's, count me in too. I just used sysctl > to put the drive into PIO mode to get around it for now. Not sure at what mode mines are running (most likely UDMA 33 as I can't use normal 80pin UDMA 66 cables for design reasons but I also don't care. I don't know of any IDE drive which can even do 33Mbyte/s) but as said, never had such problems in the last three months. Neither with 4STABLE nor with 4.1 STABLE. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message