From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Oct 19 19:06:29 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id TAA10073 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 19 Oct 1995 19:06:29 -0700 Received: from hemi.com (hemi.com [204.132.158.10]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id TAA10061 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 1995 19:06:19 -0700 Received: (from mbarkah@localhost) by hemi.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id UAA15465; Thu, 19 Oct 1995 20:09:50 -0600 From: Ade Barkah Message-Id: <199510200209.UAA15465@hemi.com> Subject: Re: Bragging rights.. To: terry@lambert.org (Terry Lambert) Date: Thu, 19 Oct 1995 20:09:50 -0600 (MDT) Cc: hasty@rah.star-gate.com, dennis@etinc.com, jkh@time.cdrom.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199510200124.SAA03804@phaeton.artisoft.com> from "Terry Lambert" at Oct 19, 95 06:24:45 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 931 Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > > To bad I can't get ISDN at home for my FreeBSD machine =( =(. > > (complain complain U.S. West) > > You don't want ISDN anyway. ... [usage charges here] > > This is done with the rationale that you are tying up switching > equipment, which you wouldn't be tying up if you were using Frame > Relay (packet switched) instead of ISDN (circuit switched) in the > first place. Yup... of course, I can't get frame relay into my condo either. =( Too bad, since I'll have a free adtran 64k csu/dsu from the office. So it's the old PPP-over-modem for the FreeBSD box. Load balancing, anyone ? =) (I just asked M.J Karels about this today in class, but he went talking about meta interfaces in the kernel and such.) =) -Ade -------------------------------------------------------------------- Inet: mbarkah@hemi.com - HEMISPHERE ONLINE - www: --------------------------------------------------------------------