From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 4 12:15:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D05D106564A; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 12:15:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from services.ipt.ru (services.ipt.ru [194.62.233.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1351C8FC0C; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 12:15:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gate.ipt.ru ([194.62.233.123] helo=h30.sp.ipt.ru) by services.ipt.ru with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1PvTul-000EYW-LV; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 15:15:23 +0300 From: Boris Samorodov To: Oliver Lehmann References: <201103041043.p24AhwQ8023264@repoman.freebsd.org> <28478789@h30.sp.ipt.ru> <20110304130842.119715ssjn44nps8@avocado.salatschuessel.net> Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 15:15:23 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20110304130842.119715ssjn44nps8@avocado.salatschuessel.net> (Oliver Lehmann's message of "Fri, 04 Mar 2011 13:08:42 +0100") Message-ID: <58879204@h30.sp.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/audio/wmauda Makefile ports/audio/xmp Makefile ports/audio/mp3splt-gtk Makefile ports/audio/audacious-dumb Makefile ports/multimedia/tunapie Makefile ports/multimedia/xfce4-xmms-plugin Makefile ports/sysutils/conky ... X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 12:15:25 -0000 Hi Oliver, On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 13:08:42 +0100 Oliver Lehmann wrote: > Boris Samorodov wrote: > > > > Was PORTREVISION bump really needed for those ports? > They have a hard or optional dependency to audacious so in my opinion - yes. I'm not sure what you do mean. What's the "hard" and "optional" dependency? And what changed at the main port that those dependent ports in your opinion should be bumped? -- WBR, bsam