Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 19:25:09 +0000 (UTC) From: Christopher Nehren <apeiron+usenet@coitusmentis.info> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [kde-freebsd] HEADS UP: KDE 3.4 committed to ports Message-ID: <slrnd3rjke.2ql8.apeiron%2Busenet@prophecy.dyndns.org> References: <200503201919.40306.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <200503202013.20094.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2005-03-20, Michael Nottebrock scribbled these curious markings: > Detail correction: > >> 2.) Now update the remaining KDE ports. >> >> portupgrade arts\* kde\* > ^^ > -O I started my upgrade before you made that commit, and of course portupgrade asked me about a bunch of then-stale dependencies. Can I assume that telling pkgdb to just delete them is safe, since the ports in question will be reinstalled anyway? That's what I did, and that was my reasoning. Best Regards, Christopher Nehren -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCPc6Ok/lo7zvzJioRAp/gAJ0UAjakk55g2jg0LSgfOAhfjIRn3wCbB0h9 8PhlKOr+v6F8gAVAgKAzx+c= =IBpS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- I abhor a system designed for the "user", if that word is a coded pejorative meaning "stupid and unsophisticated". -- Ken Thompson If you ask the wrong questions, you get answers like "42" and "God". Unix is user friendly. However, it isn't idiot friendly.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?slrnd3rjke.2ql8.apeiron%2Busenet>