Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 04:59:04 -0700 (PDT) From: pjd <peter_dunning@dsl.pipex.com> To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Subject: Re: packages Message-ID: <16467426.post@talk.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <16447055.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <16447055.post@talk.nabble.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
olivier@gautherot.net wrote: > > Peter, I've been compiling OpenOffice a number of times on a VIA EPIA with > a 1GHz C3 and 512MB of RAM - it just takes about 36h for the bare package > (I mean once you've installed Bison, Java and the other > tools/environments). > I remember compiling an older version on a Athlon 1800+ with 512MB in less > than 8 hours - it can do it while you're asleep. I know the machine must > be > full-steam ahead in this process and you shouldn't do much in parallel on > the > machine but it does work with limited resources. > > Now, I agree that "pkg_add -r openoffice.org-2" is a more convenient way > of > doing it... ;-) > I've just discovered that ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/packages/All/ has a package openoffice.org-2.3.1_1.tbz, however what version of FreeBSD is this for (I'm on 1386 7.0-RELEASE? am I going to have to recompile for version 2.4? ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-7.0-release/All still has no openoffice. If the one in ports/packages/All is correct then why can't portupgrade -NPP and pkg_add -r not find it? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/packages-tp16447055p16467426.html Sent from the freebsd-openoffice mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16467426.post>