From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 7 15:50:01 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 714C55E2 for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 15:50:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BF28133C for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 15:50:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s07Fo1q4062804 for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 15:50:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id s07Fo1hk062803; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 15:50:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 15:50:01 GMT Message-Id: <201401071550.s07Fo1hk062803@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Mikolaj Golub Subject: Re: bin/161526: script(1) outputs corrupt if input is not from a terminal X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: Mikolaj Golub List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 15:50:01 -0000 The following reply was made to PR bin/161526; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mikolaj Golub To: Karli =?koi8-r?Q?Sj=22oberg?= Cc: "bug-followup@FreeBSD.org" , "aw1@stade.co.uk" , "stb@lassitu.de" , "trociny@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: bin/161526: script(1) outputs corrupt if input is not from a terminal Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 17:45:38 +0200 On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 10:46:11AM +0000, Karli Sj"oberg wrote: > Hi! > > This was reported two years back, with patch set to MFC after 3 days, > according to: > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=226403 > > My systems are currently running 9.2-RELEASE and this patch still isn't > included, which I think is unfortunate, since it totally solves the > problem of running e.g. portupgrade somewhere not executed from a > terminal, which is awesome! It was merged to stable/9 in r226591 http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=226591 (and the commit was traced by this PR) so I beleive 9.2-RELEASE includes it. If you still observe behavior that looks strange for you please provide more details. -- Mikolaj Golub