From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Aug 23 13:14:50 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from 2711.dynacom.net (2711.dynacom.net [206.107.213.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A11A237B423 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 13:14:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from urx.com (dsl1-160.dynacom.net [206.159.132.160]) by 2711.dynacom.net (Build 101 8.9.3/NT-8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA00444; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 13:14:39 -0700 Message-ID: <39A430AF.6E4C60AC@urx.com> Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 13:14:39 -0700 From: Kent Stewart Reply-To: kstewart@urx.com Organization: Dynacom X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Andresen,Jason R." Cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: Re: Strange conflict References: <39A42600.9A8A7A85@mitre.org> <39A42A04.84D91736@urx.com> <39A42A61.407170FA@mitre.org> <39A42D2F.19DA3ECB@urx.com> <39A42D92.BDA993A3@mitre.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Andresen,Jason R." wrote: > > Kent Stewart wrote: > > > > "Andresen,Jason R." wrote: > > > > > > Which makes it look like the card is taking irq 11, not 5. Even more > > > interesting is that the Soundblaster is the only card that reports > > > taking irq 5. Is it possible for the device to lie on the dmesg output? > > > > I've never seen that happen but that doesn't mean it can't. What about > > dma and i/o port addresses? The SB usually used something like dma 1,5 > > and i/o 220 and 330. > > > > The only machine I have an old SB in is only setup to run Win2K > > Server. > > Well, for comparison: > > rl0: port 0xe800-0xe8ff mem > 0xe6801000-0xe68010ff irq 11 at device 15.0 on pci0 > rl0: Ethernet address: 00:48:54:85:63:3a > miibus0: on rl0 > rlphy0: on miibus0 > rlphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto > ... > sbc0: at port 0x220-0x22f irq 5 drq 1 flags 0x15 on > isa0 > sbc0: setting card to irq 5, drq 1, 5 > pcm0: on sbc0 > > Annoyingly, I can't seem to find an conflict with either of the cards > over the entire dmesg output (as posted in my original post). The > Realtek is a PCI card, so they aren't even close to the same address > space as the ISA SB, plus IIRC the RealTek is in some sort of horrible > PIO mode due to the braindead design of the chipset (that's what you get > for paying $5 for a NIC I guess). I would try Rick's approach and reserve IRQ for legacy. I had a 3C509 that I use for my DSL line have it's IRQ grabbed by an Adaptec Scsi card after I pulled on Intel 100+ NIC out. None of them were $5 cards :). Kent > > -- > _ _ _ ___ ____ ___ ______________________________________ > / \/ \ | ||_ _|| _ \|___| | Jason Andresen -- jandrese@mitre.org > / /\/\ \ | | | | | |/ /|_|_ | Views expressed may not reflect those > /_/ \_\|_| |_| |_|\_\|___| | of the Mitre Corporation. > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA mailto:kbstew99@hotmail.com http://kstewart.urx.com/kstewart/index.html FreeBSD News http://daily.daemonnews.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message