From owner-freebsd-bugs Thu Aug 10 01:34:19 1995 Return-Path: bugs-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id BAA24714 for bugs-outgoing; Thu, 10 Aug 1995 01:34:19 -0700 Received: from clem.systemsix.com (clem.systemsix.com [198.99.86.131]) by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id BAA24708 for ; Thu, 10 Aug 1995 01:34:00 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clem.systemsix.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) with SMTP id CAA16703; Thu, 10 Aug 1995 02:33:18 -0600 Message-Id: <199508100833.CAA16703@clem.systemsix.com> X-Authentication-Warning: clem.systemsix.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol From: Steve Passe To: Guido.vanRooij@nl.cis.philips.com (Guido van Rooij) Cc: bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem with S3 server (3.1.2) In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 10 Aug 1995 09:24:44 +0200." Date: Thu, 10 Aug 1995 02:33:15 -0600 Sender: bugs-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Hello, > Steve Passe wrote: >> >> I'm not sure if that one is necessary. You defininately DO NOT >> have a ti3026 ramdac on that board (unless they radically changed >> it's design), it uses the bt485 ramdac. > Look here...I *know* that I have a ti3026. It's on the card. I just looked at the latest README.S3 (XFree86-3.1.2) and indeed it does list a second "stealth 64" that uses the S3-968 video chip and TI3026 clock/ramdac chip. Not enought info there to tell if it is a re-design or another product. Looked in modeDB.txt and AccelCards, but found no additional clues... I re-scanned your config file, didn't see anything bad... Steve Passe smp@teal.csn.org