From owner-freebsd-current Thu Oct 8 09:25:31 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA27458 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 8 Oct 1998 09:25:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA27424 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 1998 09:25:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dag-erli@ifi.uio.no) Received: from hindarfjell.ifi.uio.no (2602@hindarfjell.ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.130]) by ifi.uio.no (8.8.8/8.8.7/ifi0.2) with ESMTP id SAA22487; Thu, 8 Oct 1998 18:24:47 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from dag-erli@localhost) by hindarfjell.ifi.uio.no ; Thu, 8 Oct 1998 18:24:46 +0200 (MET DST) Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: Matthew Thyer , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is tickadj still required in -CURRENT ? References: <5743.907863138@critter.freebsd.dk> Organization: University of Oslo, Department of Informatics X-url: http://www.stud.ifi.uio.no/~dag-erli/ X-other-addresses: 'finger dag-erli@ifi.uio.no' for a list X-disclaimer-1: The views expressed in this article are mine alone, and do X-disclaimer-2: not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or X-disclaimer-3: company with which I am or have been affiliated. X-Stop-Spam: http://www.cauce.org/ From: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling C. =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= ) Date: 08 Oct 1998 18:24:45 +0200 In-Reply-To: Poul-Henning Kamp's message of "Thu, 08 Oct 1998 18:12:18 +0200" Message-ID: Lines: 19 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by hub.freebsd.org id JAA27438 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Poul-Henning Kamp writes: > In message , Dag-Erling C. =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= writes: > >Poul-Henning Kamp writes: > > > In message <199810081342.XAA01038@eddie.dsto.defence.gov.au>, Matthew Thyer writes: > > > > So, has FreeBSD-CURRENT's kernel been fixed and can tickadj be removed > > > > from the base system ? > > > Yes and no. > > Care to elaborate, or are we just too stupid to comprehend the depth > > of Your Maginificence's explanation? > Yes, it has been fixed. > No, it hasn't been removed. The original question was "can tickadj be removed". You answered no. I think it might be relevant to explain *why* it can't be removed. If it *can* be removed, but hasn't, shouldn't it be done? DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - dag-erli@ifi.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message