From owner-cvs-all Wed Feb 27 11: 0:33 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (rwcrmhc51.attbi.com [204.127.198.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1C4137B405; Wed, 27 Feb 2002 11:00:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from InterJet.elischer.org ([12.232.206.8]) by rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020227190026.RGGK2626.rwcrmhc51.attbi.com@InterJet.elischer.org>; Wed, 27 Feb 2002 19:00:26 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA01145; Wed, 27 Feb 2002 10:48:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 10:48:20 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer To: Bill Fenner Cc: julian@freebsd.org, cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/usb ohci.c uhci.c In-Reply-To: <200202271739.JAA07197@windsor.research.att.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG maybe a comment may stall that.. On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Bill Fenner wrote: > > > 2/ Recode loop to convince gcc that it does initialise a variable > > (use do-while instead of for() so gcc knows that we always go through > > at least once. Feel free to check my logic. > > This is why I hate -Werror. Coding for the compiler vs. for readability > is always going to end up being a lose. Next year someone will come through > here and say "Why isn't this a for() loop? That would make it much more > reasable"... > > Bill > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message