Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 28 Apr 2006 18:57:49 -0400
From:      Alexander Kabaev <kabaev@gmail.com>
To:        Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: vn_lock & ffs_snapremove
Message-ID:  <20060428185749.171da2bc@kan.dnsalias.net>
In-Reply-To: <20060428130030.GC1270@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
References:  <20060428130030.GC1270@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 16:00:30 +0300
Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote:

> Look at the two code fragments
> 
> 1. from vn_lock(9):
> 
> 		error = VOP_LOCK(vp, flags | LK_INTERLOCK, td);
> 		flags &= ~LK_INTERLOCK;
> 		KASSERT((flags & LK_RETRY) == 0 || error == 0,
> 		    ("LK_RETRY set with incompatible flags %d\n",
> flags)); /*
> 		 * Callers specify LK_RETRY if they wish to get dead
> vnodes.
> 		 * If RETRY is not set, we return ENOENT instead.
> 		 */
> 		if (error == 0 && vp->v_iflag & VI_DOOMED &&
> 		    (flags & LK_RETRY) == 0) {
> 			VOP_UNLOCK(vp, 0, td);
> 			error = ENOENT;
> 			break;
> 		}
> 
> 2. ffs_snapremove(9):
> 
> (vp->v_vnlock for snapshot vnode vp points to sn_snlock)
> 		lkp = vp->v_vnlock;
> 		vp->v_vnlock = &vp->v_lock;
> 
> Is there anything that would prevent these two fragments to
> intervene ? Esp. bad looks the situation where VOP_LOCK() from
> vn_lock executed and locked doomed snapshot vnode, after that
> ffs_snapremove replaces vnode lock and VOP_UNLOCK attempted on
> _another_ lock.
> 
> If this scenario can happen (as it seems), then, probably,
> some measures like transferlockers(9) are needed ?
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

Привет,

тут возникло предложение наказать тебя commit bit-ом. Интересует мнение
самого наказуемого на это предложение :)

-- 
Alexander Kabaev

[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFEUp3zQ6z1jMm+XZYRAoEWAJ9VtwZg94ZLbvmlsUPOYsxLUmfG+gCg1Zq4
ioRpw9kTRUfSlqW4KQV/hIc=
=bk5j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060428185749.171da2bc>