From owner-freebsd-current  Fri Mar 24 14:19:43 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B2E137BBDB
	for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 24 Mar 2000 14:19:38 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu)
Received: (from wollman@localhost)
	by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA46260;
	Fri, 24 Mar 2000 17:19:34 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from wollman)
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 17:19:34 -0500 (EST)
From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Message-Id: <200003242219.RAA46260@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
To: Steve Kiernan <stevek@tislabs.com>
Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: breakage still in sys/systm.h
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10003241706260.13885-100000@mufasa.va.tislabs.com>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10003241706260.13885-100000@mufasa.va.tislabs.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

<<On Fri, 24 Mar 2000 17:12:32 -0500 (EST), Steve Kiernan <stevek@tislabs.com> said:

> The definitions of major() and minor() in sys/systm.h break usage of the
> header.  Since sys/types.h defines major() and minor() as macros which
> compute the major and minor numbers, this creates an order dependency on
> sys/systm.h and sys/types.h.  Is this not a bad thing?

No, since they don't conflict.  <sys/types.h> defines the major and
minor macros iff _KERNEL is not defined, and <sys/systm.h> is a
kernel-only header.

-GAWollman

--
Garrett A. Wollman   | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same
wollman@lcs.mit.edu  | O Siem / The fires of freedom 
Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame
MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA|                     - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message