From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Oct 23 08:45:33 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA11512 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Fri, 23 Oct 1998 08:45:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from pau-amma.whistle.com (s205m64.whistle.com [207.76.205.64]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA11507 for ; Fri, 23 Oct 1998 08:45:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dhw@whistle.com) Received: (from dhw@localhost) by pau-amma.whistle.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) id IAA17027; Fri, 23 Oct 1998 08:33:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dhw) Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1998 08:33:59 -0700 (PDT) From: David Wolfskill Message-Id: <199810231533.IAA17027@pau-amma.whistle.com> To: jesper@skriver.dk, root@swimsuit.internet.dk Subject: Re: route changes erratically (routed) Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <19981023100223.G8559@skriver.dk> Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1998 10:02:23 +0200 >From: Jesper Skriver >Enable OSPF on both the cisco and the portmasters, OSPF has sigificant >advantages over RIP, it supports CIDR among other things. RIP version2 >could also solve your problem. Except that the Lucent RABU (formerly Livingston) folks looked at RIPv2 (after they already supported OSPF), and decided against doing RIPv2 in the PortMasters. (At least, this is what I recall having read in discussions in the portmaster-users mailiang list.) So OSPF would seem to be the way to go. david -- David Wolfskill UNIX System Administrator dhw@whistle.com voice: (650) 577-7158 pager: (650) 371-4621 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message