From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 25 09:13:18 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0D7A16A41B for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 09:13:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3026C13C458; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 09:13:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <46F8D12E.7060202@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 11:13:18 +0200 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Benjie Chen , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Kernel panic on PowerEdge 1950 under certain stress load X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 09:13:19 -0000 Benjie Chen wrote: > Ivan and Kris, > > I will try to get a kernel trace -- it may not happen for awhile since I am > not in the office and working remotely for awhile so it may not be easy to > get a trace... but I will check. > > It looks like the problem reported by that link, and some of the links from > there though... Does it really? i.e. did you compare the function names in detail and find that they match precisely, or do you just mean "they are both panics of some description and I dunno what it all means"? :) I ask because the linked trace does not involve a spinlock, which means it cannot be precisely the same trace. Kris