From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 3 18:00:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C37E16A42A for ; Wed, 3 May 2006 18:00:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CD1243D97 for ; Wed, 3 May 2006 18:00:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.4) id k43I0Jmk014686; Wed, 3 May 2006 13:00:19 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 13:00:19 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: "No@SPAM@mgEDV.net" Message-ID: <20060503180019.GC65700@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20060503084313.cfa8d990.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <000901c66ed4$4cf6c280$dededede@avalon.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000901c66ed4$4cf6c280$dededede@avalon.lan> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.5-PRERELEASE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: wanted: hp-ux glance pendant X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 18:00:36 -0000 In the last episode (May 03), No@SPAM@mgEDV.net said: > > I'm not familiar with glance, but have a look at systat, > > specifically, the vmstat screen. > > well, thx for the hint. the tool indeed looks nice, and curious as i > am, i monitored some action with it. i started it with > "systat -vmstat 1 >/dev/ttyv9 &" > to get the output to a non-shelled terminal and watch the stats on > another screen. right now, the only process currently still working > on the system is the monitor tool itself: > > top output: > PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU COMMAND > 60297 root 1 126 0 1816K 1256K RUN 221:45 99.02% systat > > is this normal? it will at least render the figures inaccurate, not? Systat doesn't like it if it has no stdin; adding a "