From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 30 09:12:43 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3722937B401; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 09:12:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from panzer.kdm.org (panzer.kdm.org [216.160.178.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2AC743FBF; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 09:12:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ken@panzer.kdm.org) Received: from panzer.kdm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by panzer.kdm.org (8.12.9/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h3UGCfPM003320; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 10:12:41 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from ken@panzer.kdm.org) Received: (from ken@localhost) by panzer.kdm.org (8.12.9/8.12.5/Submit) id h3UGCerq003319; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 10:12:40 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from ken) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 10:12:40 -0600 From: "Kenneth D. Merry" To: Poul-Henning Kamp Message-ID: <20030430101240.A3295@panzer.kdm.org> References: <20030430092040.A2864@panzer.kdm.org> <12343.1051717206@critter.freebsd.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <12343.1051717206@critter.freebsd.dk>; from phk@phk.freebsd.dk on Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 05:40:06PM +0200 cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/cam/scsi scsi_da.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 16:12:43 -0000 On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 17:40:06 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <20030430092040.A2864@panzer.kdm.org>, "Kenneth D. Merry" writes: > > >> >Oops. I did a 'make universe', but wrongly assumed that it would stop on > >> >any errors. > >> > >> No, universe chugs, based on the philosophy that it probably ran for > >> N hours already, and you might be after somethinn else entirely... > > > >True, I suppose it would be a major pain to blow up a make universe. With > >the failures, it took 8.5 hours on my box, and probably would have taken > >a bit longer if the 64 bit kernel builds had succeeded. > > It's the kind of thing I usually kick off when I go to bed :-) Yep. > >> Well, if you just look at the stdout/stderr from the make universe, it > >> should say that something failed, you can then traverse the relevant > >> log file for what exactly failed. > > > >It didn't mention any failures. (output attached) > > Actually, that's interesting. I seem to have caught it in my private > extension of universe: I build a native and a sparc64 cross release. > > I'm sure there is a good explanation why it breaks the kernel in the > cross-release but not in the cross-world... It does break the kernel builds, it's just that you have to dig through the logs for each kernel build to see the breakage. It doesn't show up in the top level make universe output. It seems like a release would have to break, since you're actually trying to do something with the kernels (stick them in the release directory, I suppose). Ken -- Kenneth Merry ken@kdm.org