From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Feb 28 16:44:43 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F3EFBAC;
 Thu, 28 Feb 2013 16:44:43 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from freebsd-bugs-local@be-well.ilk.org)
Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19145EA;
 Thu, 28 Feb 2013 16:44:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.41])
 by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 771EE33C18;
 Thu, 28 Feb 2013 11:44:28 -0500 (EST)
Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147)
 id 028863983C; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 11:44:26 -0500 (EST)
From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-bugs-local@be-well.ilk.org>
To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/60550: [kernel] [patch] hitting process limits produces
 sub-optimal error messages
References: <201302281410.r1SEAqDf076844@freefall.freebsd.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 11:44:26 -0500
In-Reply-To: <201302281410.r1SEAqDf076844@freefall.freebsd.org>
 (linimon@freebsd.org's message of "Thu, 28 Feb 2013 14:10:52 GMT")
Message-ID: <44sj4ge6c5.fsf@lowell-desk.lan>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Cc: silby@freebsd.org, BDE@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-bugs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 16:44:43 -0000

This PR is almost ten years old, but I think it's still a good idea
(with @bde's changes). Any chance of committing it?