From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 27 17:30:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41ACE16A4CE for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:30:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from alpha.siliconlandmark.com (alpha.siliconlandmark.com [209.69.98.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB20843D3F for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:30:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com) Received: from alpha.siliconlandmark.com (andy@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i9RHUpJY075872; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:30:52 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com) Received: from localhost (andy@localhost)i9RHUpfC075869; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:30:51 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from andy@siliconlandmark.com) X-Authentication-Warning: alpha.siliconlandmark.com: andy owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 13:30:51 -0400 (EDT) From: Andre Guibert de Bruet To: Zoltan Frombach In-Reply-To: <001601c4bc49$ed540ec0$e201a8c0@p4> Message-ID: <20041027132855.R42571@alpha.siliconlandmark.com> References: <20041027003640.K42571@alpha.siliconlandmark.com> <001601c4bc49$ed540ec0$e201a8c0@p4> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner: Found to be clean cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portupgrade -af question X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 17:30:54 -0000 On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Zoltan Frombach wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 10:35:16PM -0700, Zoltan Frombach typed: >>> 8. recompile the few ports that needs special options and/or local >>> patching >> >> You can omit step 8 by editing /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf. e.g. >> >> MAKE_ARGS = { >> 'lang/perl5.8' => 'WITH_THREADS=yes', >> } > > In fact, I do have those compile options set in my > /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf file. But are you sure that portupgrade will use > those even when called with the -P flag ( eg: portupgrade -af -P )? If it is > true then of course step 8 can be eliminated. Can anyone confirm this? Step 8 is required, because of the possibility of a binary package upgrade with -P. Regards, Andy | Andre Guibert de Bruet | Enterprise Software Consultant > | Silicon Landmark, LLC. | http://siliconlandmark.com/ >