Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 15:15:38 -0500 From: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: RFC: Putting mozilla-1.0 back in the tree Message-ID: <20020903201538.GC81002@leviathan.inethouston.net> In-Reply-To: <1031083190.330.3.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> References: <1031083190.330.3.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 03:59:49PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > I'm in the process of putting Mozilla 1.0 back in the tree as > www/mozilla, and moving Mozilla 1.1 to www/mozilla-devel. It seems from > the Mozilla release cycle diagram that they are planning a Mozilla 1.0.1 > and, if necessary, a 1.0.2 release, and 1.1 is still "bleeding edge." > > To that end, I have a question. Should I bump the PORTEPOCH of > www/mozilla again, or just nudge people who upgraded to change the > origin of mozilla 1.1 to mozilla-devel? I think the latter, but I > wanted to get some feedback on this. Thanks. If you go by the book, you must bump PORTEPOCH. I don't think it would hurt either, and would probably cause a lot less confusion for those who aren't on this list that might have installed it. -- David W. Chapman Jr. dwcjr@inethouston.net Raintree Network Services, Inc. <www.inethouston.net> dwcjr@freebsd.org FreeBSD Committer <www.FreeBSD.org> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020903201538.GC81002>